Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemircioğlu, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Sezai
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-13T11:55:48Z
dc.date.available2025-10-13T11:55:48Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationDemircioglu, G., & Ozkan, S. (2025). Do Autonomic Nervous System and Perceived Exertion Responses Differ Between Walking and Virtual Reality-Engaged Walking?. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 28(8), 969–977. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_121_25en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/732
dc.description.abstractBackground: Walking, important for cardiovascular health and autonomic regulation, is often done on a treadmill. Aim: This study compared the physiological responses of treadmill and virtual reality walking, focusing on their effects on the autonomic nervous system, recovery, and perceived exertion. Methods: This study included 40 sedentary participants, assigned to a treadmill group (TG) or a virtual reality group (VRG). Both groups performed 20-minute treadmill walking, with the VRG additionally using the Wii Fit program. Autonomic assessments with the Polar H10 measured heart rate (HR), parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), sympathetic nervous system (SNS), stress index (SI), and the LF/HF ratio. At the same time, perceived exertion was assessed using the OMNI scale. Physiological responses were measured at baseline (T0), post exercise (T1), and at 10 (T2) and 30 minutes (T3) of recovery. Results: The study showed significant differences in HR (P = 0.040) and LF/HF (P = 0.038) between T0-T1 in the TG. In the VRG, significant changes were found in HR (P = 0.016), SNS (P = 0.010), SI (P = 0.014), and LF/HF (P = 0.020) between T0-T1, with an additional difference in LF/HF at T0-T2 (P = 0.032). OMNI scores significantly differed at all time points (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in autonomic parameters or OMNI scores (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Although perceived exertion was similar, the VR group showed greater SNS activation due to immersion, while recovery was identical for both methods. This understanding could contribute to developing rehabilitation strategies considering autonomic VR responses.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/njcp.njcp_121_25en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutonomic nervous systemen_US
dc.subjectSympathetic nervous systemen_US
dc.subjectVirtual realityen_US
dc.subjectWalkingen_US
dc.titleDo Autonomic Nervous System and Perceived Exertion Responses Differ Between Walking and Virtual Reality-Engaged Walking?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ergoterapi Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDemircioğlu, Gamze
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzkan, Sezai
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage969en_US
dc.identifier.endpage977en_US
dc.relation.journalNIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster