Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCiğercioğlu, Nazlı Busra
dc.contributor.authorBazancir-Apaydın, Zilan
dc.contributor.authorApaydın, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorBaltacı, Gül
dc.contributor.authorGüney Deniz, Hande
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T10:44:32Z
dc.date.available2024-09-04T10:44:32Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationCigercioglu, N. B., Bazancir‐Apaydin, Z., Apaydin, H., Baltaci, G., & Guney‐Deniz, H. (2024). Differences in ankle and knee muscle architecture and plantar pressure distribution among women with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12028en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-1146
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/382
dc.description.abstractBackground The aim of this study was to compare the plantar pressure distribution and knee and ankle muscle architecture in women with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsFifty women with knee OA (mean age = 52.11 +/- 4.96 years, mean Body mass index (BMI) = 30.94 +/- 4.23 kg/m2) and 50 healthy women as a control group (mean age = 50.93 +/- 3.78 years, mean BMI = 29.06 +/- 4.82 kg/m2) were included in the study. Ultrasonography was used to evaluate knee and ankle muscles architecture and femoral cartilage thickness. The plantar pressure distribution was evaluated using the Digital Biometry Scanning System and Milleri software (DIASU, Italy). Static foot posture was evaluated using the Foot Posture Index (FPI), and pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale.ResultsThe OA group exhibited lower muscle thickness in Rectus Femoris (RF) (p = 0.003), Vastus Medialis (VM) (p = 0.004), Vastus Lateralis (p = 0.023), and Peroneus Longus (p = 0.002), as well as lower Medial Gastrocnemius pennation angle (p = 0.049) and higher Fat thickness (FT) in RF (p = 0.033) and VM (p = 0.037) compared to the control group. The OA group showed thinner femoral cartilage thickness (p = 0.001) and higher pain severity (p = 0.001) than the control groups. FPI scores were higher (p = 0.001) in OA group compared to the control group. The plantar pressure distribution results indicated an increase in total surface (p = 0.027), total load (p = 0.002), medial load (p = 0.005), and lateral load (p = 0.002) on dominant side in OA group compared to the control group.ConclusionsKnee and ankle muscle architecture, knee extensor muscle FT, and plantar pressure distribution in the dominant foot differed in individuals with knee OA compared to the control group.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/jfa2.12028en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKnee osteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectMuscle architectureen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.titleDifferences in ankle and knee muscle architecture and plantar pressure distribution among women with knee osteoarthritisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authoridhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-2499en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBaltacı, Gül
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCHen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster