Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorElgun, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorCapan, Belen Sirinoglu
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Canan
dc.contributor.authorOrdueri, Nazli Ece Gungor
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-29T12:10:10Z
dc.date.available2024-02-29T12:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationÇapan, B.Ş., Duman, C., Ordueri, N.E., & Elgun, T. (2022). In Vitro Examination of The Cytotoxicity of Alkasite Restorative Material on Dental Pulp Stem Cells.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/320
dc.description.abstractAim: The clinical suitability of restorative dental materials is determined by evaluating their biocompatibility, and physical and chemical properties. The present study examined the cytotoxic effects of three different dental restorative materials on human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). Material and Methods: In this study, composite, high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC), and an alkasite were used. In total, 12 samples of each material were prepared for cytotoxicity assays. Cytotoxic effects were determined by considering biomaterial releases. Cell viability and proliferation were observed and analyzed at intervals of 24 and 72 hours using both the methyl-thiazole-diphenyl-tetrazolium (MTT) and xCELLigence cytotoxicity assays. Data were calculated using the RTCA-DP integrated software of the xCELLigence system and the GraphPad Prism 9.1.1 program. Data from the proliferation experiments were statistically evaluated using the Two-way ANOVA test. Results: Alkasite exhibited the highest cytotoxicity, whereas HVGIC and composite did not exhibit any significant difference compared with the control. There was no difference between the two time points in the cytotoxicity of composite and alkasite in the MTT assay. However, the cytotoxicity of HVGIC was higher at 72-hours than at 24-hours. Similar results were obtained with both assays. Although alkasite exhibited higher cytotoxicity than composite and HVGIC, all materials exerted slightly cytotoxic effects (60%–90% cell viability) on DPSCs. Discussion: Considering its aesthetic, and mechanical properties, alkasite can be clinically preferred instead of other materials in cavities that are not close to the dental pulp.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBayrakol Medical Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4328/ACAM.21846en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlkasiten_US
dc.subjectAlkasiteen_US
dc.subjectKompoziten_US
dc.subjectCompositeen_US
dc.subjectCam İyonomer Simanen_US
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cementen_US
dc.subjectSitotoksisiteen_US
dc.subjectCytotoxicityen_US
dc.subjectDiş pulpasıen_US
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of alkasite restorative material on human dental pulp stem cellsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesien_US
dc.authoridCanan Duman / 0000-0003-1240-1285en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDuman, Canan
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage15en_US
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Clinical and Analytical Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster