Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGürses, Hülya Nilgün
dc.contributor.authorUçgun, Hikmet
dc.contributor.authorZeren, Melih
dc.contributor.authorKülli Denizoğlu, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Erkan
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-08T12:03:25Z
dc.date.available2023-12-08T12:03:25Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationGurses, H. N., Ucgun, H., Zeren, M., Denizoglu Kulli, H., & Cakır, E. (2022). Does the effect of comprehensive respiratory physiotherapy home-program differ in children with cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis?. European journal of pediatrics, 181(8), 2961–2970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04509-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/231
dc.description.abstractBronchiectasis is a form of airway damage as a consequence of endobronchial infection and infammation and may be present in diferent diseases. The underlying aetiologies include both cystic fbrosis (CF) and a group of non-cystic fbrosis diseases (NCFB) such as immunodefciency, primary ciliary dyskinesia, or severe pulmonary infection. Although children with CF and non-cystic fbrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) have many similar clinical features, their responses to exercise may be diferent. The aim of this study was to compare the efcacy of a comprehensive respiratory physiotherapy (CRP) home-program in children with CF and NCFB. Thirty children with CF and thirty children with NCFB were included in the study. Both groups performed the CRP home-program twice daily for 8 weeks. Pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of training. Both groups experienced signifcant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength (p<0.001). Maximum expiratory pressure, exercise capacity, and peripheral muscle strength were further improved in NCFB group compared to CF (p<0.05); however, there was a great variability in the improvements for each variable. Conclusion: CRP is benefcial both for children with CF and NCFB and adherence to the program was high in both groupsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00431-022-04509-5en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKistik fibrozisen_US
dc.subjectCystic Fbrosisen_US
dc.subjectKistik Olmayan Fbrozis Bronşektazien_US
dc.subjectNon-Cystic Fbrosis Bronchiectasisen_US
dc.subjectSolunum Fizyoterapisien_US
dc.subjectRespiratory Physiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectPulmoner fonksiyonen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary Functionen_US
dc.subjectEgzersiz Kapasitesien_US
dc.subjectExercise Capacityen_US
dc.subjectSolunum ve Periferik Kas Gücüen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory and Peripheral Muscle Strengthen_US
dc.titleDoes the effect of comprehensive respiratory physiotherapy home‑program differ in children with cystic fibrosis and non‑cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8003-4440en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKülli Denizoğlu, Hilal
dc.identifier.volume181en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2961en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2970en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Pediatricsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster