dc.contributor.author | Yapıcı, Furkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Gür, Volkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarı, İlker Fatih | |
dc.contributor.author | Köksal, Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Yurten, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.author | Üçpunar, Hanifi | |
dc.contributor.author | Çamurcu, Yalkın | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-19T12:50:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-19T12:50:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Yapıcı, F., Gür, V., Fatih Sarı, İ., Köksal, A., Yurten, H., Üçpunar, H., & Çamurcu, Y. (2022). Prescription of knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction? Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(3), pp. 355–363. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8906
| en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2587-1250 | |
dc.identifier.uri | WOS: 000849187100004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | PubMed ID: 36475105 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/129 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: This study aims to compare the clinical results of patients rehabilitated with or without a rehabilitative knee brace (RKB) after
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Patients and methods: This retrospective, comparative study was conducted at between January 2013 and December 2017. A total of
119 patients (112 males, 7 females; mean age: 32.0±8.6 years; range, 18 to 45 years) with acute ACL ruptures treated with arthroscopic
ACL reconstruction and rehabilitated with (n=56) or without RKB (n=63) participated in the study. The minimum follow-up time was
24 months. The ACL quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and Tegner Activity Level Scale were used for the
evaluation of the QoL, knee function, and activity level, respectively. The time to return to sports was recorded. The side-to-side difference
in the anterior translation of the tibia was measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer.
Results: The mean follow-up time was 38.4±9.1 (range, 24 to 56) months. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar
between groups. Regarding QoL, knee function, and activity level, no significant difference was observed between patients who used RKB
and those who did not use it at the postoperative 12th month (p=0.95, p=0.56, p=0.98, respectively) and the latest follow-up (p=0.21, p=0.73,
p=0.99, respectively). The mean time to return to sports (nearly 11 months for both groups) and side-to-side difference in the anterior tibial
translation at the latest follow-up was also similar between groups (p=0.15 and p=0.15, respectively). There was no graft rupture during
the follow-up in both groups. The complication rates were 7.9% and 7.1% for no brace and brace groups, respectively, without a statistically
significant difference (p=0.87).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference between the rehabilitative brace and no brace groups
in clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | National Library of Medicine | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8906 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Knee brace | en_US |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.title | Prescription of knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction? | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.authorid | Yalkın Çamurcu / 0000-0002-3900-5162 | en_US |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Çamurcu, Yalkın | |
dc.identifier.volume | 68 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 355 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 363 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |