Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYapıcı, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorGür, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorSarı, İlker Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKöksal, Alper
dc.contributor.authorYurten, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorÜçpunar, Hanifi
dc.contributor.authorÇamurcu, Yalkın
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T12:50:05Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T12:50:05Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationYapıcı, F., Gür, V., Fatih Sarı, İ., Köksal, A., Yurten, H., Üçpunar, H., & Çamurcu, Y. (2022). Prescription of knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction? Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(3), pp. 355–363. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2022.8906 ‌en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-1250
dc.identifier.uriWOS: 000849187100004
dc.identifier.uriPubMed ID: 36475105
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/129
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare the clinical results of patients rehabilitated with or without a rehabilitative knee brace (RKB) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Patients and methods: This retrospective, comparative study was conducted at between January 2013 and December 2017. A total of 119 patients (112 males, 7 females; mean age: 32.0±8.6 years; range, 18 to 45 years) with acute ACL ruptures treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and rehabilitated with (n=56) or without RKB (n=63) participated in the study. The minimum follow-up time was 24 months. The ACL quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and Tegner Activity Level Scale were used for the evaluation of the QoL, knee function, and activity level, respectively. The time to return to sports was recorded. The side-to-side difference in the anterior translation of the tibia was measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer. Results: The mean follow-up time was 38.4±9.1 (range, 24 to 56) months. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Regarding QoL, knee function, and activity level, no significant difference was observed between patients who used RKB and those who did not use it at the postoperative 12th month (p=0.95, p=0.56, p=0.98, respectively) and the latest follow-up (p=0.21, p=0.73, p=0.99, respectively). The mean time to return to sports (nearly 11 months for both groups) and side-to-side difference in the anterior tibial translation at the latest follow-up was also similar between groups (p=0.15 and p=0.15, respectively). There was no graft rupture during the follow-up in both groups. The complication rates were 7.9% and 7.1% for no brace and brace groups, respectively, without a statistically significant difference (p=0.87). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, there was no significant difference between the rehabilitative brace and no brace groups in clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNational Library of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5606/tftrd.2022.8906en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectKnee braceen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.titlePrescription of knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Atlas Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridYalkın Çamurcu / 0000-0002-3900-5162en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇamurcu, Yalkın
dc.identifier.volume68en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage355en_US
dc.identifier.endpage363en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster