Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKülli Denizoğlu, Hilal
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T09:02:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T09:02:01Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationDenizoglu Kulli, H. (31.05.2022). Acute Effect of Static Stretching, PNF and Motor Imagery on Hamstring Flexibility. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences. 6(2). pp. 335-340. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1005358 ‌en_US
dc.identifier.issn2458-8938
dc.identifier.issn2564-7288
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1005358
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12900/82
dc.description.abstractFasen, JM, O'Connor, AM, Schwartz, SL, Watson, JO, Plastaras, CT, Garvan, CW, Bulcao, C, Johnson, SC, and Akuthota, V. A randomized controlled trial of hamstring stretching: comparison of four techniques. J Strength Cond Res 23(2): 660-667, 2009-This study compared the efficacy of 4 different hamstring-stretching techniques. Flexibility can be achieved by a variety of stretching techniques, yet little research has been performed on the most effective method. The 2 basic types include active stretching, in which range of motion is increased through voluntary contraction, and passive stretching, in which range of motion is increased through external assistance. The 2 types of active stretching include neuromobilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). Our study aims to determine which type of stretching technique is most effective in improving hamstring length. One hundred subjects between the ages of 21 and 57 were enrolled in the study. Intrarater reliability of hamstring length measurement was performed using 10 subjects. All 100 subjects were included in a randomized controlled trial of 5 different groups comparing different hamstring-stretching techniques. Outcome measures, including hamstring length and perceived level of hamstring tightness, were recorded on all subjects initially, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks. After 4 weeks of stretching, there was a statistically significant improvement in hamstring length (p < 0.05) using active stretches as compared with passive stretches. From weeks 4 through 8, hamstring length for the active stretching groups decreased. After 8 weeks of stretching, the straight leg raise (SLR) passive stretch group had the greatest improvement in hamstring length. There was no correlation between hamstring flexibility and age, initial tightness, or frequency of exercise per week. Improvement in hamstring flexibility was greatest for the SLR passive stretch. Also, using PNF in the 90/90 active stretch provided better knee range-of-motion improvements than the 90/90 passive methods did.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDokuz Eylül Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.30621/jbachs.1005358en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMotor görüntülerien_US
dc.subjectStatik germeen_US
dc.subjectHamstring esnekliğien_US
dc.subjectHamstring flexibilityen_US
dc.subjectViscoelasticityen_US
dc.subjectFlexibilityen_US
dc.titleAcute effect of static stretching, PNF and motor imagery on hamstring flexibilityen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi, Meslek Yüksekokulu, Fizyoterapi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authoridHilal Denizoğlu Külli / 0000-0002-8003-4440en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKülli Denizoğlu, Hilal
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage335en_US
dc.identifier.endpage340en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster